For many years sports leagues have had so many awards in and out of it. In recent memory there has been so many good players the media and the fans have had a strong argument for who should win. But the new argument is rising that there should be a co-winner for the big awards.But can this happen and keep the awards with their prestige?
The issues with the suggestion is making winners less important. If the co-winners were to seriously considered then we would have to pick how it work. The system isn't fit for the required extra system. would it even matter if we consider the winners in history. People just might view the winners if it ever happens multiple times. The leagues would need to preserve there awards protegee. If two people were to get it the only good thing could be is players getting recognition.
The true reason this would ever bring is people don't like losing. But the fact is losing is a way of life but more importantly is a reason to compete with others. People who care will in my opinion will lose respect the of the awards.
No comments:
Post a Comment