Is Paul Pierce better then Dwyane Wade?

When players retire, they have many opinions that only players can have. Experience is a valuable factor people see these ex-players have and people want to see what they say. Now there are times when they say things that we question. The question is what do we think about what he said about D Wade.

Paul Pierce said that he was better then wade.lets look at the stats to see if this has any bases. The first major different between them is the number of championships each of them have. Wade has three vs the one Peirce has with three more years in the league. If this was the stat that he was better in then he would have argument but there is more. In all the years of D Wade career he has been a 13 time all star in his entire career only has 10 selections in his career. the argument of this achievement could be the fans always liked Wade better and there is bias here. The most impotent one here is the all teams and all defenses team selections each one had. these selections are mainly based on there performance. Wade is an 2 time all NBA first team with 6 more selection in second and third teams, while Paul has never been in all NBA first team. He was only selected 4 time in the second and third team. For the all NBA defenses teams Paul was never selected. wade was selected in it 3 different times.

Paul is a great player but Wade shined brighter then Paul for many years. At the end of the day wade was a better player overall because he was able to do more with less in the same conference. Wade was considered a great without his super team while Paul was just good before his super team formed.wade numbers and reputation puts him way above Paul.